Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Footwear industry dismayed by tariff turnaround

EU member states Germany, Austria and Malta, have decided to abstain on a crucial vote on whether or not to extend anti-dumping duties on footwear imports from China and Vietnam angering the UK footwear industry.

Last month 15 EU member states voted against the proposed extension of the anti-dumping duties, which add a 16.5% tariff to shoes made in China and 10% to shoes made in Vietnam. Some 10 EU member states voted in favour of the extension and two abstained from voting.

The vote was seen as a first round victory for the industry and for the Drapers Dump the Duties campaign.

However, a sudden U-turn by the three member states ahead of the final vote on December 22, has shocked the UK footwear industry as Germany had previously declared its opposition to the continuation of the duties.

Germany has decided to abstain on condition that the duties come to a definitive end in 15 months’ time, despite the European Commission’s admission that there can be no legal guarantee of this.

“This is a catastrophe for all those who care about European business, European consumers and, more broadly, about Europe’s place in the world, and it raises serious questions about the application of EU trade law and policy in these times of economic crisis” said Manfred Junkert, director of the Federation of the German Footwear Industry. 

The European Footwear Alliance is now consulting its members with a view to launching a legal challenge.

Readers' comments (2)

  • How can Malta now abstain after their comments by Malta's General Retailers and Traders Union (GRTU) in the December issue of Satra Bulletin
    They clearly stated that the duty should be scrapped and why they should have to pay extra hefty costs to protect the few European producers.

    Have they now had pressure exerted to change their vote

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What’s new is all I can say. No only the ADD but China has extra duty as well.
    Why no make it fair on everyone. Add to India or take it off China one or the other.
    Closed factories in China, unemployment in China the UK all because of this misplaced thinking. Would not give more work to the EU as we all know

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.