Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Mad Woman?

The news that the coalition government wish to pressure the fashion industry to use realistic sized models and to kitemark images where airbrushing has taken place, has taken the industry by the scruff of its very skinny neck.

Lynne Featherstone, the Lib Dem Equalities Minister, has been leading the charge to challenge the fashion industry to change its attitude and norms.  Featherstone has long been outspoken about the size zero issue and feels that there is a literal misrepresentation of the human form, that is highly damaging to impressionable young minds.

 

Joan from Mad Men

Joan from Mad Men is cited by Featherstone as being a good role model for young girls. Her size, not her smoking or promiscuity, of course. 

 

When it comes to selling a product, if advertising is misleading, there are regulations to police it, like in the case of the Maybelline mascara ads. Since it came to light that the extra long eyelashes were not due to the mascara, the company were forced to add a disclaimer admitting to the digital enhancement. However, when you are being sold a dream and it is a case of a model’s body being adjusted, where do you draw, or should I say airbrush the line?  

 

 

Maybelline advert

Maybe it’s not Maybelline! 

 

Lynne would like to see kitemarks indicating where airbrushing has taken place. The theory is honourable, but how would it work in practice? Literally every fashion image you see has been doctored; some a little and some a lot. Who is to say what is acceptable? Who would decide that it is not alright to change a dress size but airbrushing out spots is allowed, for example?  Would there need to be kitemarks over every part of the body that has been adjusted, so as to let young minds know, her hair was her own, but her thighs were thinned down? 

 

Crystal Renn

The two sides of model Crystal Renn - which do you prefer? 

 

The reality is that fashion sells a dream. People don’t want to see imperfections, they want to be inspired and to aspire to a fantasy, which by its very definition, is not real. To change the notion of perfection, one would have to change the ideals of beauty ingrained into our psyche, which starts at the beginning of the fashion food chain. The high-end designers would need to make their samples in bigger sizes, which means that the models wearing them in magazines could also be bigger. Until they do this nothing will change. 

What do you think about this debate, is Lynne’s campaign doomed? 


 

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.