Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Could M&S disappear from our high street? Please, no.

As my interview about Marks & Spencer’s first quarter results on Sky News came to end today, presenter Adam Boulton asked me and Verdict analyst Maureen Hinton if M&S could disappear from our high streets.

I think I managed to compose myself (judge for yourself in the video above), but I wanted to scream out: “NO!” as goose pimples emerged on my forearms.

M&S clearly has problems as far as womenswear is concerned, but I can’t accept that such a British fashion stalwart could cease to exist. Admittedly, if M&S were to launch today, it would look completely different. Who would want to cater for an entire nation? Who would want to tough it out in the middle market? M&S today would launch with a much more niche proposition, target a more specific consumer and sit at a different end of the market.

But we can’t go back in time. What M&S can do, though, is offer its customers some clarity. Before I went on Sky News, I gave my mum a call to ask her about M&S. She’s a stylish woman and an M&S target customer. “I still go there to have a look but I don’t really like it anymore,” she told me. “I used to like Limited, but it’s too crazy now, and Autograph is a bit dull.” She still buys underwear there.

I used to love Limited, too. It was cool, picked up on key trends but interpreted them expertly to suit the M&S customer. It also had originality. But I agree with my mum; I think it’s gone too young and too trend-led. Autograph still looks good and you can find some great pieces within the collection.

But I can’t help thinking that seven sub-brands (another M&S customer said to me: “what on earth is “Indigo”) is too many. Do we need Per Una and M&S Woman? And what, indeed, is the need for Indigo, a “casual clothing line for the 30-plus woman”? Isn’t the 30-plus woman heading to Uniqlo for that instead?

M&S has in its favour the love of the British public – we want to like it, we want it do well, but we also feel like we own it, so we want it to satisfy our needs. M&S needs to offer quality basics, but keep the offer tight – a white vest is a white vest. Quality is top of mind for M&S’ customers and, finally, design is arguably the most important element. We don’t necessarily want orange hot pants – (watch my Sky News interview above for an explanation…) – but we want great looking, well-cut clothes. And we’ll support you, M&S, if you deliver.

Ana Santi also appeared on Woman’s Hour on BBC Radio 4 - listen here

Ana Santi, deputy editor, Drapers

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.