Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

With £600 gilets, M&S autumn 13 falls wide of the mark

The much-anticipated preview of Marks & Spencer’s autumn 13 collection drew everyone’s focus to the quality of the range – but at what expense to the actual customer?

Belinda Earl and co clearly had a message to get across this week: quality, quality, quality. Having been criticized by everyone from consumers to suppliers in recent months, it’s clear the high street staple wanted people to know it had the foundations finally in place.

This is good common sense – if you can’t stop shoppers from complaining about holes and thin fabric, you will never tempt them back again. But it seems to me, and others in the industry I’ve spoken to, that the design team’s time would have been best spent focusing on the volume products that are destined to turn M&S around, rather than high end statement pieces costing hundreds of pounds.

This is the flip side of a focus on quality. Gilets costing £600; dresses for £400; trousers at £350; even coats at £300 felt at odds with what many felt was the second major issue M&S needed to iron out: its focus on the core customer.

M and S autumn 13

M and S autumn 13 - this dress will retail for £399

Just who are these pieces aimed at? The heartland customer, used to spending £20 on a top or £30 on trousers is unlikely to give up 20-times that amount on an overgrown waistcoat. Equally the sort of person who would think nothing of dropping a few hundred pounds on a dress would probably not do in M&S.

Consumer spend is, of course, not just about quality of the garment but perceived quality of the brand name and despite Marc Bolland’s many references to Selfridges at the launch event, his business is just not in that bracket.

Obviously these items are not expected to sell in droves, and are designed to create excitement around the range the will filter down to the less expensive items. But this is crunch time for M&S and its team should have been spending all its time and energy getting the fundamentals (including the store environment) right before tinkering around with the cherry on top.

Once the hype from the launch dies down, it is the shopper who will have to be convinced. I hope enough has been done on the volume side of the business for M&S to have done that.

Readers' comments (4)

  • Wish they would stop having delusions of who and what they are. They have thousands of staff to ask so take it back to the core M&S not try to pleasae all the people. Just look how JLP have opened their arms to their customer and succeeeded.
    Why do they have fashion items in sizes 18/ 20 /22/ 24 my God a size 8 wants to be seem in the same outfit as a size 20, I dont think so! Thin models showing to mid British customers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • M&S just don't know what they are doing. And these people actually get paid?

    Focus on your core customer first, before giving the wider public what they do not want.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 80s chrome swastika display stands, plastic hangers,30 on diplay of each garment,school dining hall flooring,fashion garments in big sizes,polyester trousers, this feels like a good food retailer that doesn't really understand modern clothes retailing,anone would think the boss comes from Morrisons

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 80s chrome swastika display stands, plastic hangers,30 on diplay of each garment,school dining hall flooring,fashion garments in big sizes,polyester trousers, this feels like a good food retailer that doesn't really understand modern clothes retailing,anone would think the boss comes from Morrisons

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.