Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Creditors fret over Blue Inc administration

Suppliers and landlords of young fashion chain Blue Inc have expressed concern over the impending administration of the retailer’s subsidiary, A Levy & Son.

Blue Inc filed notice at the High Court on January 6 of its intention to appoint Leonard Curtis as administrator for A Levy, and sources indicate this will take place early next week.

The retailer plans to close 60 to 65 of its 232 UK shops, resulting in 500 job losses, to focus on more profitable stores and its online business.

A source close to the situation indicated Blue Inc will seek to dispose of the required leases by putting A Levy, which owns an undisclosed number of Blue Inc’s leases, into administration. The business is expected to get rid of the unwanted stores and buy back the shops within the company it wants to continue to trade.

Chief executive Steven Cohen stressed to Drapers that Blue Inc as an entire business was not going into administration, as the retailer’s trading name and brands are owned by separate subsidiaries within the business.

However, some Blue Inc suppliers will also be affected.

One supplier said: “We invoice to A Levy – it buys the stock so we will be hit by this. Luckily I have retention of title, so the damage to my business is limited but I’ve had factories in India and China calling me to ask what they should do as they don’t have [retention of title] and they will be seriously affected.”

One of Blue Inc’s landlords added: “Obviously it is disappointing when a retailer decides to go down the administration route to shed stores but our exposure is limited. We have lots of options and we are confident we can replace it, so in the long run it may be beneficial to us.”

Another source indicated that shedding the desired stores will not be “as simple as Blue Inc would like” as many landlords own both profitable and non-profitable Blue Inc shops, so could be less inclined to negotiate on the remaining stronger stores.

Like-for-like sales at Blue Inc rose 3%, while online sales increased 52% in the four weeks to January 3. However, it discounted heavily throughout the period, selling all stock for £20 or less. This week Sales prices have dropped to £10 or less.

Readers' comments (2)

  • Blue Inc was always heading south, so suppliers should of seen it coming...

    Whatever Blue Inc. officially states, the business is finished.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 5 years ago the majority of high street chains found their website was fast becoming their number 1 store. Now the webstore can be more profitable than 20 stores put together!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.