Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Dawson edges closer to administration

Scottish manufacturer Dawson International has taken a step closer towards administration, after it was forced to suspend its shares yesterday.

The former owner of Pringle has been warning for some weeks that it could have to call the administrators in, after proposals to manage its pension scheme – in the face of an estimated £50m deficit – fell through in July.

Yesterday, the luxury fabrics manufacturer took a step closer to the brink by revealing it had suspended trading of its shares after receiving new notices setting out the full extent of its pension shortfall.

According to a statement released to the stockmarket, Dawson’s directors are now considering whether the notices “are valid” – if they are, the announcement added, it may be necessarily to appoint administrators.

Although timescales are not clear, if no solution is brought forward it could see the loss of 200 jobs and the end of the 140-year-old business.

The company stressed that its US knitwear business, Dawson Forte, was “well-funded and continues to trade normally”, and as such would not be entered into administration.

The news follows several years of Dawson attempting to reduce the pension deficit, which is significantly greater than the knitwear firm’s £1m market cap. It had put forward proposals to address the gap, including entering the Pension Protection Fund, but this was scuppered three weeks ago when the PPF and the Pensions Regulator rejected “all offers” made by the company.

The two bodies argued that Dawson was not offering sufficient compensation to take on the burden – at the time, Dawson said it “simply has no more to offer”.  

Readers' comments (1)

  • so sad as this used to be a mighty business - at one stage in 1986/87 it was contemplating Coats Paton ......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.