Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Dunkerton calls Superdry general meeting

Superdry co-founder, Julian Dunkerton, has officially demanded a shareholder meeting as part of his efforts to stage a comeback at the business.

The requisition for a general meeting calls for Dunkerton to be appointed as a non-executive director. 

It also calls for Peter Williams, chairman of online retailer Boohoo, to be made an independent non-executive director. 

Under section 304 of the Companies Act 2006, the board must now call a general meeting of shareholders within 21 days.

Dunkerton is acting with co-founder James Holder. Together the pair own 29% of Superdry.

They have created a website called savesuperdry.com, which has been established to maximise transparency for stakeholders in the campaign to ”save” the company. 

Dunkerton and Holder have been trying to engage with the board privately for several months, during which time their proposals to help turn around the company’s poor performance and strategic failings were rebuffed.

Their latest efforts were rejected earlier this week.

Dunkerton said: “All shareholders in Superdry are continuing to suffer as a direct result of the current misguided strategy. We have all waited and suffered long enough: the time to act is now. This is why, having exhausted all other possible avenues for a constructive and consensual solution with the board, we have been left with no other option but to requisition a general meeting to put the question of my return to the board, together with the appointment of Peter Williams, to a shareholder vote.

“We find ourselves at a critical juncture for Superdry. Since I left the board in March 2018, the company and the brand have been devastated through a misguided strategy: the recent Q3 results (issued on 7 February 2019) were very weak, even coming on the back of two profit warnings - issued within 6 weeks of each other; the share price has dropped by over 70% since January 2018; Superdry is the only retailer in its peer group that has reported a decline in online sales in the autumn/winter 2018 season; and its products have been on sale at reduced prices for 48 of the past 52 weeks. Together, we can turn things around and set Superdry back on the path to creative and operational success.

Williams spent 13 years on the board of Selfridges, during which time he served as both CFO and CEO. He was also previously the senior independent director at Asos. 

A Superdry spokeswoman said: “The board of Superdry has had ongoing engagement with Julian Dunkerton and James Holder since Julian decided to leave the Company in March 2018, to ensure their views have been heard and understood. The board has carefully considered their proposals when they have been put forward and has unanimously rejected them as not being in the interests of all shareholders. The board believes that Mr Dunkerton’s views on the strategic direction of the group are directly at odds with the unanimous views of the management team and the board and therefore his return to the business would be counter-productive and highly disruptive. In terms of the appointment of Peter Williams, the board has significant reservations that he could ever be an independent director and represent the interests of all shareholders equally, given the context of his introduction.”

 

 

Readers' comments (3)

  • Either you keep your company privately owned or you float and get out completely. Having shares, but with other bodies running the show is never good for the heart, however right you may be.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If this is correct, 48 out of 52 weeks on discount, he has a very good point... all retailers in the UK need to step back and consider the environment that has been created. Products shipping at the wrong time..selling AW stock in summer heat, selling SS stock in snow (this week excepted :-).. Black Friday, mid-season sales etc etc... we reap what we sow and consumers are punishing us for it..

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @anon

    Your previous comment is spot on, but brands and retailers collectively are run very badly. Any common sense suggested, such as your comment, would generate a P45 as the Industry is not interested in competent people in senior positions, hence the state it is in.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.