Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Ministers to crack down on 'reckless' bosses

Ministers are working on proposals to disqualify or fine bosses who attempt to walk away from businesses to avoid payroll and pension liabilities.

Under new plans drawn by up the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, directors will face investigation if they try to escape paying a dissolved company’s debts to staff and creditors.

The government will also introduce new measures to enable companies in financial distress to continue to trade through the restructuring process and give viable companies more time to seek investment to rescue the business. The plans are being put forward in response to the corporate governance and insolvency consultation, which launched in March this year.

Business minister Kelly Tolhurst said: “The UK is a great place to do business with some of the highest standards of corporate governance. While the vast majority of UK companies are run responsibly, some recent large-scale business failures have shown that a minority of directors are recklessly profiting from dissolved companies. This can’t continue.

“That is why we are upgrading our corporate governance to give new powers to authorities to investigate and hold responsible directors who attempt to shy away from their responsibilities, help protect workers and small suppliers and ensure the UK remains a great place to work, invest and do business.”

Readers' comments (2)

  • What about the small companies that need help now following the HOF administration? How can Mike Ashley buy a company 30 minutes after it has gone into administration and walk away with all our stock ?This stock is the suppliers property until paid for . We have been trying to get it back since August 10th.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lets hope these future regulations have “teeth” to avoid the spectacle of recent retail bosses treating parliamentary committees in a cavalier and derisory Fashion

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.