Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Next criticised over apprenticeship scheme

Next has been accused of employing low-earning apprentices to shave £2.5m off its wage bill, while providing them with inadequate support.

Next Store New Oxford Street London

Next New Oxford Street

Next New Oxford Street

A Channel 4 Dispatches programme, Low Pay Britain, which aired on Monday, claimed the retailer was given nearly £1.8m of public funds last year for training 800 apprentices, who each worked 30 hours a week.

Dispatches claimed that, because the apprentice minimum wage of £3.30 an hour is lower than that of normal workers over the age of 21, which is £6.70 an hour, this would have saved Next a total of £2.5m.

The programme also revealed that Next has stopped recruiting to its retail, wholesale and call centre apprenticeship schemes after they were rated “inadequate” by education watchdog Ofsted in August.

Ofsted inspectors, who visited Next in July, concluded that not enough support was being provided for its 583 apprentices or their managers, and expressed concern about high dropout rates.

A spokesman for Next said it had accepted the report’s findings and recommendations and “immediately commenced a vigorous programme of improvements”.

It received an “encouraging” monitoring visit from Ofsted in September, but admitted it still has more to do. It will not take on new apprentices until it has achieved “a much improved” inspection.

Next said it pays apprentices 67% above the statutory legal minimum of £3.30 per hour.

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • Another massive business putting profit before people. Thing is, all other businesses, including small ones, will have to do the same to compete.
    That said, the apprenticeship scheme is a naive approach to jobs for young people at best and I cant help thinking the government dreamed this up to specifically help their " mates" in business?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.