Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Primark fans may desert after child labour allegations

Primark faces losing up to 42% of its customers in the aftermath of child labour allegations, an exclusive ICM Research poll commissioned by Drapers shows.

The value fashion retailer has been the darling of the high street during the downturn because of its high volume and ultra-cheap business model.

But it appears to have lost support from a significant chunk of its core shoppers in the 18- to 44-year old bracket following last week’s BBC Panorama exposé about its supply practices.

The Drapers-ICM poll found that 42% of people who shop at Primark were now less likely or a lot less likely to shop at the retailer directly because of what they had heard in the news. 68% of them had heard about child labour allegations and 38% were aware of issues with suppliers in India.

Primark sacked three of its southern Indian suppliers featured on Panorama for sub-contracting work without the retailer’s consent a week before the documentary aired.

The potential loss of such a large number of shoppers would be a massive blow to Primark, which relies on huge volume sales to support its tiny margins.

One value expert said: “Primark is working on such low margins – the industry believes these to be between 30% and 40% – that a drop off of just 5% in volume sales would harm its profits significantly.”

The negative consumer sentiment flies in the face of the generally held industry view that Primark would escape the child labour allegations relatively unscathed because of shrinking disposable income.

Whether as many shoppers will, in fact, abandon the retailer is unclear. Only 3% of Primark shoppers cited ethical production as a key consideration when out shopping and 46% of shoppers still cited value for money as the most important factor.

Maureen Hinton, senior analyst at consultancy firm Verdict Research, said: “Primark needs to invest in good PR in order to regain consumer trust. But unless there is a sustained campaign against it, any negativity will lessen over time.”

Readers' comments (2)

  • I'm astounded that anyone is in the least bit surprised about on earth did they think they were producing skirts for £2 or whatever they charge? It was highly unlikely that they were going to be produced by well paid happy adult employees in ideal working conditions. I can't wait to see the back of all this tat, which I should imagine attributes to clogging up landfill no end.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I dont think using child labour in developing countries is such a black and white issue - child labour is exploitative but a terrible reality. However there is another dimension which many forget - many of the families of these children do not have £ to pay for education so send their children to the cities to work for £. Many of these children if they didnt work in these factories could be in worse situations such as child prostitution etc. I do not advocate child labour but the context and external circumstances should also be considered. I am orginally from Bangladesh so know the problems that many of the poor face. Welfare state does not exist in these countries. I actually think a solution would be to have factories which specifically hire children and provide housing/education. In this way, conditons are more controlled e.g hours, conditions etc, At the same time these children have a support environment allowing them to have an education too whilst earning.
    The argument is not about using child labour or not - its about looking at the reasons why children have to work in factories and the realities facing the poor in these countries. Simply 'not buying' primark and condemning them is not going to solve the problem.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.