Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Rivals settle with Lipsy over design imitations

Women’s young fashion brand Lipsy has reached undisclosed settlement agreements with two rivals over claims that two of its dresses were copied.

Lipsy, which is owned by Next, settled out of court with supplier First Dragon, which operates 20-store young fashion retailer M Butterfly, after it claimed it had copied a ruffle-tipped shift dress. The item has been removed from sale and Lipsy has received undisclosed damages.

Lipsy also settled out of court with Wasabi Frog, owner of young fashion website Lipsy threatened legal action, alleging a dress on the site copied one of its jewelled pocket dress designs. The matter was settled without proceedings for an undisclosed sum. agreed, without admitting liability, to remove its version of the dress from sale, according to Lipsy.

Lipsy said it was also pursuing retailers and brands for copyright, design right and trademark infringements in the UK, Republic of Ireland and the US.

Lipsy chief executive Jeremy Stakol said: “Lipsy is going to proactively pursue any infringements of its intellectual property rights.”

The company added that it invested “significantly” in design and that it “prided itself on its creativity”.

Lipsy is the latest fashion business to pursue alleged design infringements. All Saints launched legal action against River Island and Arcadia last year and Superdry owner Supergroup’s wholesale arm Laundry Athletics reached settlements with Arcadia and Primark in early 2009. and M Butterfly did not return calls as Drapers went to press.

Meanwhile, streetwear label Fly53 has been rapped by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for an ad the body said glamorised violence.

Fly53 said the campaign - which featured a man holding a gun to the head of another - was meant to invite visitors to the Fly53 website to confess their fashion crimes and was “not intended to be realistic”.

The ad has been withdrawn.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.