Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Sir Philip Green rebukes “defamatory” comments as MPs prepare to debate his knighthood

On the day his knighthood is set to be debated by MPs, Sir Philip Green has criticised what he termed a series of “highly defamatory and false” comments made by Frank Field, chair of the work and pensions committee.

philip green

philip green

The fresh criticism in the ongoing dispute between Sir Philip and Field concerned comments Field made in an interview with Channel 4 News. A letter from the board of Taveta Investments claims Field made “a number of highly defamatory and false statements about Arcadia and Philip Green” during the interview. 

The letter specifically criticises Field for upsetting workers at Arcadia, by claiming Sir Philip “is running Arcadia into the ground like BHS”. It also contains a list of “BHS key facts” to refute Field’s claim that assets were plundered from the company.

The letter also states that: “It is perfectly clear that you are now goading Sir Philip and Arcadia to sue you. We do not wish to waste our time at this stage getting into litigation with you.”

This comes as MPs are set to vote today on whether Sir Philip Green should lose his knighthood, in the wake of the collapse of BHS.

Green was awarded the knighthood in 2006 for services to retail, but MPs will debate and vote today on whether he should be stripped of the honour.

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • Irrelevant of what's fact or fiction, this sorry saga has damaged SPG's image and the businesses he still represents. Looking at the whole (mess), he is culpable.

    He'd be better off quickly resolving the pension issue rather than pick fights with individual MPs. The delay simply suggests he will only help if he keeps his knighthood.

    He will lose all respect (from everyone) if that turns out to be true.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.