Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Editor's Comment: Suppliers need protection for industry to survive

Comment

This is an interesting conversation, however we must be careful what we wish for. I agree that cva’s in particular must be reviewed as they are being used more as a way as negotiating as opposed to helping a business survive. Regarding the whole administration process this is pretty ugly whatever happens. We cannot legislate against poor decisions, feel we should be criticising HOF first, know Mike Ashley is a convenient bad boy but he pays his bills. Suspect tightening of the laws would result in HOF going a year or so back and no buyers would go anywhere near it. It that what we really want? Let’s hear some proposals, it’s easy to say ‘help us’ but what do we as an industry really want??

Posted date

18 August 2018

Posted time

10:49 am

required
required
required
required