Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Eight things you need to know about pre-pack administrations

Drapers unpacks some of the myths surrounding pre-pack administrations.

Controversial pre-pack administrations have become popular tools for struggling retailers seeking to rescue their businesses. Creditors – including landlords and suppliers – can be left out of pocket when a struggling retailer goes into administration and either its owner or a new party buys back the more profitable and desirable parts of the company almost instantaneously, thereby jettisoning loss-making or expensive stores.

Yet despite their unpopularity, many argue that saving the viable parts of the business is more favourable than a wholesale administration, liquidation and compulsory redundancies. Here, Drapers uncovers some of the more nuanced aspects of pre-packs and what can be done to avoid them.

The high street chain is overhauling 10% of its store estate

 

 

1 A solvent deal is considered preferable

Several alternatives to tackle financial difficulties are taken into account, such as refinancing, sales of all or part of the business or resetting covenants with existing lenders, before the notion of a pre-pack is entertained. The process of deciding on the most suitable solution can take up to 12 weeks.

2 Cutting the rent bill may save the business

As an early consideration – before they even begin to look at options such as refinancing – company boards can try to negotiate reduced rents to ease their financial burden.

3 Stakeholders can help

Directors are often reluctant to engage other stakeholders because they are afraid of the outcome. However, financial advisers recommend including as many key suppliers, significant customers and shareholders as possible at an early stage, to help weigh up more solutions and maximise chances of creditor support.

4 Pre-packs can be the lesser of two evils

Pre-packs are seen as a more favourable outcome than administrations in most cases, as the latter involves complex issues regarding funding and payment of suppliers, among other factors. For fashion retailers, where the principal asset is stock, there is the added uncertainty of what they could receive from trading stock out.

5 The market prefers a fluid approach

Several distressed merger and acquisition processes have been known to fail when an adviser puts a specific sale value out to prospective trade parties, financial investors and lenders. The challenge management teams face is to approach the market with a plan that does not eliminate the possibility of either a solvent or insolvent outcome, as proposing one can cancel out the other.

6 Advisers do try to find solvent solutions

Some sceptics believe advisers might encourage pre-pack arrangements for their own benefit. However, these are in fact not as lucrative as other administration processes, mainly because pre-packs run for a shorter period of time and do not provide opportunities to quote prices.

7 The returns for unsecured creditors are low

Insolvency practitioners argue that even though return to unsecured creditors in a pre-pack would be significantly reduced compared with alternative outcomes, the buyer often negotiates some deals with existing suppliers to maintain continuity. Advisers maintain this is the best result where a company could otherwise have gone bust and lost jobs on a larger scale.

8 There are tools to make the process more transparent

The Pre Pack Pool is an independent body of experienced business people who can offer an opinion on the purchase of a business and/or its assets by connected parties to a company where a pre-pack sale is proposed. It was among several measures designed to improve transparency recommended by the 2014 Graham Review into pre-pack administrations. However, only 28% of the 188 connected-party pre-packs that took place between 1 November 2015 and 31 December 2016 were referred to the Pool, as reported by its inaugural report.

 

 

 

Readers' comments (5)

  • As you illustrated your article with a picture of Jones I think that it is a great example of whats wrong with prepacks.
    Its not necessarily that prepacks are at fault its often that with the convoluted financing that is in place the failed private equity owners end up with the vast majority of the spoils. Endless paid a fair price for the business which will almost entirely go to Alteri. Thus leaving their trusting suppliers receiving a few pennies in the pound whilst Alteri lose very little over the period of their disastorous ownership.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The bottom line is that suppliers /landlords suffer when a company they supplier has been badly run. Until it is illegal it will keep happening . It's legalised robbery.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There are occasions when a pre-pack makes sense for all concerned, particularly with large retailers where there's a lot of jobs at stake.

    Unfortunately, it's all too frequently abused and simply used as a vehicle for individuals to get out of all their debts and continue trading, with no personal loss.

    Some, like Baron Jon, made a career out of it...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • “There are too many pre-pack deals around. We need to enhance our morals and ethics in business in this country.”

    UK government should review insolvency laws to provide a more “ethical, moral and level playing field”, which gives all creditors access to information and the opportunity to have an input in the future of a company in administration.

    “Suppliers are often left with nothing and it is completely unacceptable,” “The law needs to change. It is affecting people’s jobs and livelihoods.”

    Is “increasingly difficult” for suppliers to do business with British retailers without running the risk of losing money due to firms falling into insolvency.

    César Araújo

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • darren hoggett

    Totally agree with Andrew's comments. Pre packs are unacceptable and morally reprehensible and why brands still queue up to be taken to the cleaners by the same outfits again and again beggars belief.

    The industry as whole is badly run and unless pre-packs are outlawed, it will keep happening.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.