Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

The EU: Should we stay or should we go?


As the European Union referendum on June 23 approaches, Drapers takes the temperature of the fashion industry over this historic vote

There are only six weeks to go until the referendum on whether or not the UK should remain part of the European Union, yet confusion and uncertainty still reigns. While on the face of it most business leaders are in favour of staying, behind closed doors many have reservations. They may not be ready to leave the EU, but it does not follow that they are happy with the status quo.

The fashion and footwear industry is no exception. An online poll of 600 Drapers readers between February 23 and May 2, showed that 59% of you think we should remain in the EU and just more than a quarter (29%) would back a Brexit. The remaining 22% are undecided.

A change in policy on the duties and taxes we benefit from could hit retailers’ bottom lines hard

Nitin Passi, chief executive of womenswear etailer Missguided

Ann Summers chief executive Jacqueline Gold, Burberry chief executive Christopher Bailey, Kurt Geiger chief executive Neil Clifford, Mothercare chairman Alan Parker and former Marks & Spencer chief executive Marc Bolland have all publicly supported prime minister David Cameron’s argument that a Brexit would put the economy at risk.

On May 25, Drapers and UKFT Rise will host a fashion industry debate on whether or not the UK should leave the European Union. Confirmed panellists include: Ankur Shah, founder of footwear brand Mahabis; John Hoerner, former Arcadia Group chief executive and Tesco clothing boss; and Tory MP Damian Collins. The debate will take place at the RBS Auditorium, 280 Bishopsgate, London, from 6.30pm. Book tickets here

Other fashion names to nail their colours to the remain mast are London Fashion Week designer Amanda Wakeley, footwear designer Lucy Choi and British outerwear and lifestyle brand Belstaff’s chief executive Gavin Haig, who have expressed concerns that a Brexit would make business more difficult, having a negative impact on trade and transatlantic relations. (Continues below)

Nitin Passi, chief executive of womenswear etailer Missguided, is among those arguing that the UK should remain part of the EU: “A change in policy on the duties and taxes we benefit from could hit retailers’ bottom lines hard, and could lead to a lot of uncertainty and instability in the future,” he says. 

Robert de Keyser, managing director of fashion distributor Jonny Drama, argues that trade tariffs are a concern for brands and their agents: “If we leave the EU and there is no trade agreement, we’d have to pay VAT at the port of entry, as well as a trade tariff. That would have very serious cash flow implications. I don’t know how many brands would stand that easily.”

He adds: ”One of the problems is we don’t know what Brexit means. I’m not personally the biggest fan of Europe and its meddling, but I believe we’re better in because I don’t know what the alternative is. Everything about Brexit is unknown. I think it would hurt consumer confidence.”

There won’t be a trade war with Europe. This is a pragmatic and connected world

Simon Carter

Helen Mountney, managing partner at management consultancy Kurt Salmon, picks up on the tariff point: “With a ‘leave’ decision one question is whether there would be additional tariffs on goods to and from the EU. Not only would exporting retailers risk higher costs, but outside of the single market, imported goods may also become more expensive.

“Sourcing teams may have to relook at the impact of potential extra costs and this could lead to changes in their supply base – not something they will be able to organise overnight. They may be faced with carrying any increase for some months while they search for other areas where they can perhaps shave off a percentage or two to protect their margins.”

Simon Carter, owner of the eponymous men’s tailoring and accessories brand, says: ”I can’t think of a single good reason to leave; the EU is a massively flawed project but it’s better than the alternative.” Controversially, he dismisses the idea that there will be a negative impact on trade in the event of a Brexit: “There won’t be a trade war with Europe. This is a pragmatic and connected world: we’re not going to suddenly ban BMW imports. The economic arguments are a red herring.”

It is more of a challenge to find people with pro-Brexit views – or, rather, those who will go on the record with them. In March, Next chief executive Lord Wolfson became the first – and so far only – leader of a large fashion multiple to stick his head above the parapet and back the campaign for Britain to leave the EU. He argued that “a nation that wants to stand still is a nation in decline”. Specifically, he hit out at the red tape around planning at a national and EU level, which he said makes it difficult for retailers to open new stores.

Belinda Dickson, founder and creative director of cashmere brand Belinda Robertson, says: “I acknowledge a degree of uncertainty if we leave the EU, but it pales into insignificance when weighed against the advantages of being in charge of our own destiny and the increasing marginalisation that will inevitably occur if we stand on the sidelines as the unelected bureaucrats of Brussels drive Europe to become ever more integrated.

“I do not believe it will be difficult to do a trade deal with Europe – it is so clearly in their interests. It should be borne in mind that the Swiss had a referendum, which has to be part Swiss law this year, which restricts the free movement of people and they will retain their trade deal with the EU.

”Currently the EU has no deal with the US. If, as people expect, the EU and the US do not reach a deal shortly, the UK will be free to reach its own deal with the US. It also must be easier to agree a deal between a single member state rather than the complex mix mash of national interests that is the EU.”

Theo Paphitis, entrepreneur and owner of lingerie brand Boux Avenue, tells Drapers he has criticisms of both sides of the debate: “Like BHS, the EU has forgotten who its customer is,” he argues. “There are too many countries, too many competing interests – it doesn’t work.”

Ultimately I have to go with my instinct, which is to remain in the EU

Theo Paphitis

Yet he is also mistrustful of the leave campaign: “Ultimately I have to go with my instinct, which is to remain in the EU.”

Evidently, the fashion industry has some concerns about the relationship we have with the EU, but for most the existing set-up is still preferable to a Brexit. There is too much anxiety about what it would do to trade arrangements and the knock-on effect on prices and consumer confidence. Leave campaigners may have some answers, but they cannot make any solid promises about the UK’s future outside of the EU.

As the next six weeks unfold until the vote on June 23, more leave supporters may come out of the woodwork, but for most of the fashion industry the consensus seems to be: better the devil you know.

A legal perspective

Stephen Sidkin, chair of the fashion law group at legal firm Fox Williams

  • UK retailers will continue to expand overseas regardless
  • There will likely be tighter controls on the movement of goods
  • It could become more difficult for EU brands to enter the UK

Overall I don’t think the run-up to the referendum will have a major impact on decisions to create more retail space in the UK or expand overseas. Even if we wake up on Friday 24 June and the UK has voted to leave the EU, there would be no significant change in our law for at least a couple of years. I expect new laws will be made which may have significance in respect of trade being done overseas, but we wouldn’t have to scrap legislation that has derived from the EU.

What’s more interesting is what will happen when it comes to the sending of goods to, say, Paris and Florence – whether for sale or to show at Who’s Next or Pitti. There would need to be negotiations in terms of free access and people being able to travel. Some will argue that it won’t make much difference because we’re not  part of the Schengen agreement [which allows passport-free travel across borders]. But the controls will be upped. It would also take time to negotiate a customs zone so we can ship there and they can ship here on a duty-free basis. Some have argued that it’s in the interest of the EU to put something in place. Possibly, possibly not.

I can see trade within the EU being more difficult and I can see it being more difficult for EU brands to enter the UK market. Where the EU has in place a trade agreement with a non-EU country, the UK will no longer be able to take advantage of that. We will have to put our own trade agreement in place, so there will be issues around opening stores and selling in those countries.


What leave campaign says:

Impact on trade

Leaving the EU would allow Britain to trade more freely with the rest of the world. Given that the EU sells far more to the UK than is sold in the other direction, the remaining EU member states will seek a trade agreement assuring the same level of free exchange of goods, services and capital as is the case today. The UK could also capitalise on its Commonwealth ties to have free trade deals with the likes of India, Australia and Malaysia. As a country that traditionally embraces trade, the UK could add a range of other emerging markets such as China, Indonesia and the UAE – again ones which the EU is yet to agree terms with – and offer the UK businesses a real competitive advantage over their rivals in mainland Europe and beyond.

On the economy

The UK treasury will be freed of its £15.3bn a year EU budget burden. Meanwhile, UK businesses will benefit from a less burdensome regulatory framework. EU regulations are estimated to have cost UK businesses £33.3bn last year. De-regulation will lower costs and create jobs.

What the remain campaign says: Britain Stronger in Europe

Impact on trade

The EU is our biggest trading partner. By being in the EU, the UK and our businesses can trade freely with no tariffs and barriers. If we voted to leave the EU, it would damage trade and would harm UK businesses and growth, putting millions of jobs at risk.

Negotiating as part of a 500 million-strong economy gives us clout we could never have on our own. Thanks to our membership of the EU, we benefit from free trade agreements with over 50 countries around the world. We will also benefit from new free trade agreements the EU is currently negotiating with countries such as the US, Australia and Japan. And we currently enjoy the best of both worlds, as we are trading more and more with important emerging economies such as India and China.

On the economy

We get out more than we put in. Our annual net contribution to the EU amounts to £340 per household, but the Confederation of British Industry estimates that EU membership is worth £3,000 for average households – a return of almost 10 times what we put in.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.